Header Ads

Homemade Alternator Generator - Impulse Technology!

Do you want to build your own homemade alternative energy system using the Homemade Alternator Generator? Because of the rapid increase in power bills that most people are facing, many are seeking ways to cut down on their electricity consumption or to generate alternative forms of energy.

To find a solution for these problems, I decided to try out the Home Made Energy guide that promises to teach people how to build their own wind and solar energy systems affordably.


Theoretical basis for Homemade Alternator Generator


Why is alternating current generated? This is the theoretical problem for an alternating current generator. Basically, the alternating current generated by electromagnetic induction phenomenon: the reciprocal magnetic field for the wire frame will generate the alternating current.

To create a periodic reciprocal magnetic field, we need a periodic boundary kinetic energy, the electric current generated will be in the form of beautiful and smooth Sin waves.

Comment: The source of kinetic energy is the most difficult problem. Large power plants use kinetic energy from flowing water, fossil fuels to generate kinetic energy, etc.We have kinetic energy sources, but it is not stable, such as wind power. We will find a solution for Homemade Alternator Generator.

Basic alternating current generator model:

The kinetic energy is fed to the generator, then alternating current is generated, and we pass it on to power consuming devices.

Basic block diagram:
  • Dynamic source
  • Generator
  • Power consumption equipment
Basic block diagram for Homemade Alternator Generator
However, the reality is not so. Home-made generators will be different. Because not always electric devices are consumed. If no electrical equipment is consumed, electricity will be wasted. So obviously we need an electrical storage department. Stored electricity is direct current. Just like we charge the phone battery.

After that, we will use a device that converts DC to AC. This device is called an inverter.

At this point, the block diagram for Homemade Alternator Generator will look like this:
  • Dynamic source
  • Generator
  • Power storage
  • Inverter
  • Power consumption equipment
block diagram for Homemade Alternator Generator

It is block diagram for Homemade Alternator Generator to work in practice. So you've figured out what equipment you need and what you prepare.

Prepare to Homemade Alternator Generator

Decide the source of kinetic energy

You can choose the source of kinetic energy depending on the circumstances and geographical location of the family. If the area you live in is windy, then choosing a wind power source for a generator is reasonable

In addition, there are other sources of kinetic energy:
  • The power of water - streams, rivers
  • The power of exercise - cycling produces electricity
  • Fuel source for internal combustion engines: gasoline, oil, etc.
Then is the motion transmitter to the generator. The problem is that you can make your own with a bicycle chain, belt, etc. or buy a motion transmission device.

Generator

Introduce a typical generator for generating alternating current from a kinetic energy source in nature:


Permanent Magnet AC Generator Brushless


As mentioned, you need to design a moving transmission bridge to power the generator. This is not very difficult. 

Power storage

The simplest electrical energy storage is the battery. You can buy multiple batteries to store electricity. The number of batteries depends on the total capacity of household electrical appliances. For example, the total power consumption in a day of electrical equipment is 5000W, you need to buy a number of batteries with a total capacity of at least 5000W.

Introducing new battery:

Power storage - battery
Backup link: battery 

Also, energy storage can be used:

Energy storage battery


Inverter

The inverter will convert direct current into pure alternating current - beautiful Sin wave. The dynamic power supply may be unstable, but when using the inverter, you will have a good alternating current for the consumer devices.

 Inverter transformer Pure Sine Wave


Note:

  • Currently, inverters often have energy storage features, but the storage capacity is not too large. So consider the UPS ( Uninterruptible power supply) kit below.
  • The use of inverter has built-in battery enough to provide electricity in emergencies and provide electricity for homes.




Inverter + Battery (store energy) = Battery Inverter - Uninterruptible power supply


Both the inverter and the energy storage can be integrated together, forming Battery Inverter - Uninterruptible power supply ( UPS ).

I found a large motor inverter battery - Battery Inverter - Uninterruptible power supply ( UPS ):

Battery Inverter - Uninterruptible power supply ( UPS )


Backup link for Battery Inverter - UPS : 

Practice Homemade Alternator Generator

Two important issues when practicing building an AC generator for your family are:
  • Transmits motion to provide kinetic energy to the generator
  • Calculate the capacity accordingly

All the equipment that I have introduced have instructions for use, the wiring of the wires has detailed instructions. This is not hard work.

As for the transmission, you should use belts instead of chains, as it will reduce friction and make no noise.

It is important to be knowledgeable about electricity. You can refer to alternating current: How does a homemade generator work

Homemade Alternator Generator - Other plans

Introduce another plan to Homemade Alternator Generator:



Homemade energy is being embraced by increasing numbers of people as they realize the savings and independence to be gained from it. You can learn all about how to generate your own energy using magnets on the internet.

Thousands of people have already eliminated their own home electricity bills with this free energy system. They learned how to build it by downloading a step-by-step guide online. You can find out more about how to build this homemade power system at the website link below.

Summary of the content of this new plan:

If you think the traditional way of building a generator is annoying, the program will show you another way, which is "Impulse Technology" to create a new type of electricity. This new electricity will then be converted into alternating current for use if needed.

✰* Revealed At Last: Ancient Invention Generates Energy-On-Demand

✔ Nikola Tesla’s method of magnifying electric power by neutralizing the magnetic counter-forces in an electric generator

Generates Energy-On-DemandEasy Power Plan Will Change Our World Forever

✔ Currents are 180 out of phase with each other, Lenz's law naturally is broken
✔ Principle of Resonance to achieve Overunity
✔ Generate generators without rotating motion, but based on the principle of rotating magnets. Because magnetism varies based on electronic circuit design: coils, capacitors, Negative resistance, etc.The change of magnetism does not require the rotation of the magnet.
Learn more about Homemade Alternator Generator - in the style of "magnetic generators": Self-sustaining Magnetic Generator

18 comments:

  1. What will physicists think of this unique type of Tesla energy program?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Contrary to some of your answers there is free energy! Nature’s energy provided without cost to you and me, i.e. waterfalls, solar, wind, etc. our cost is to harness it and distribute it to society. That was no difference to what Tesla was doing with his wireless energy. The difference being with Tesla’s wireless energy, it was unlimited and could be distributed at an extremely less expensive cost to society, never EVER planned to be FREE like radio was! There being expense in harnessing this ‘free natural energy’ and then getting it to industry and homes to be converted into electricity. You need to understand today’s physics is a science of objects, not a science of Nature; Tesla’s science was Nature.

      The phenomenon that started ‘wireless energy’

      A phenomenon exists, unexplained by the science of objects, when one throws a knife switch applying electricity to a circuit. Back in the days when they were using dyna motors as a power source for industry, they had people being killed when they applied the voltage to the circuit by being both electrocuted and thrown across the room by some pressure source. The voltage electrocuting people being hundreds, some thousands, times greater than what the power supply capabilities.

      So, where does this energy come from, plus also the pressure wave generated. This was Tesla’s problem to solve. Where does the energy come from and why is happening when just throwing a switch? One would never get an Edison, Marconi, or even an Einstein to solve these questions. Not only those folks, but even scientists today being taught just object science. We are close though today, we probably have discovered the ’free natural energy’ source Tesla was using and just maybe the technology to harness it has been duplicated from Tesla’s papers in secrecy. It just MAYBE used today on the Mars planet (MAYBE???).

      Potential phantom ‘free natural energy’

      In today’s world, the closest discovered phenomenon that would compare to what Tesla spent his life in solving and harnessing is what we call ‘zero-point energy’ (ZPE). So, what is ZPE?

      The question then becomes was Tesla harnessing ZPE? While discussing the harnessing, Millis alluded to mining it. Understood it just being terminology, however, a huge difference in the actual method of removing it from Nature. You mine objects, you harness horses for horsepower! Tesla’s technology harnesses energy, it is not an object to mine! What this illustrates is the different mindsets, one hung on objects, the other on both physical and nonphysical (Nature).

      Tesla’s wireless energy generator

      Presuming, if Tesla was working with ZPE he used a different name for it, calling it Luminiferous Aether, it represented a more gaseous structure verses any electron particle phenomenon. He was not using any kind of generator, transferring mechanical energy to electricity; instead he called it an Aether engine, transferring Aether energy into electricity. His engine was technology to draw the Aether (ZPE) from space with a tower receiving device and transferring it under the ground deep to broadcast it throughout the Earth.

      It being stupid to believe he would have ever considered it to be broadcasted in the air, it already existed in the air and would probably interact. This energy having no electron properties, therefore lacking its limitations also, no degeneration with distance, faster than the speed of light, transfers through everything; it has no physical properties at all. Tesla’s Aether verses ZPE could be nothing more than terminology, i.e. mine vs. harness, generator vs. engine. Physics likes to think the errored Michelson Morley experiment put an end to the Aether, which any 2nd grader could debunk the results, and now ZPE smelling a lot like what Tesla was developing his wireless energy with.

      Delete
    2. Most of today’s physicists do not have a clue what was behind Tesla’s experiments and how the wireless energy technology operated. They use their object trained science trying to understand what someone using the full natural science was developing. It is like trying to bake a cake without the recipe!

      Free energy exists all around us, it just costs us resources to convert into applicable properties for human consumption. This is what Tesla’s wireless energy project was destined to do. All one would have needed to do is stick a rod in the ground and use Tesla’s technology to covert the energy into electricity. Unfortunately, it would have upset the entire world’s economy at that period, and still would have a major effect if implemented today.

      All that was great in the past was ridiculed, condemned, combated, suppressed — only to emerge all the more powerfully, all the more triumphantly from the struggle. - Nikola Tesla

      Delete
  2. Why was Tesla's Free-Energy concept outlawed around the world in favor of a more costly fossil fuel?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There was only one reason why Tesla’s ”electrical power system” did not get off the ground, and it doesn’t require a PhD in physics to understand why it could not have happen at that particular time. Timing was the problem! If Tesla’s system, which many magnitudes better than the one in use today, if for no other reason it would not be polluting the planet, was ever implemented it would put the whole world in a huge financial depression. Most of all your other answer are either pure stupidity, or grossly wrong.

      The timing factor

      What was happening at the beginning of the 20th century, the world ‘s economy was based on providing electricity to humanity. Almost every industry had a part to offer in this construction phase of creating this huge, not only stupid but impractical, extremely vulnerable power grid in use today. Think about this, forestry, mining, manufacturing, etc. all working many hours to supply poles, wires covered with rubber, transformers, generators, the list is endless and the labor to both create the material and then install the grid. All of this creating a huge economy for the world not just America.

      Straight skinny of ‘free energy’

      First and foremost, all energy supplied by Nature is FREE!

      The cost involved is to either mine it or harness it for humanity’s usage. Some of it is limited and some of it is unlimited; i.e. the Sun is limited, but the Universe’s has a supply that is totally unlimited. I will let Marc Millis, an ex-NASA lead physicist of the Breakthrough Propulsion Project, tell us about this unlimited supply, Nick Cook asked Marc what Zero Point Energy was”. See: https://preview.redd.it/xvgv1gmjeyy31.jpg?width=602&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c11eca68b2e729b5e1f05cc04e2c5ccce8383c8b

      With just a tiny bit of real research, one could relate the energy source Tesla was using to be an awful lot what Marc Millis is stating here. It being extremely difficult for anyone with just a half a brain to believe two different unlimited energy sources exist in Nature. As stated, this being. See: https://preview.redd.it/1cidyhiteyy31.png?width=602&format=png&auto=webp&s=55642743be524848a3211fa9115efde47fcc1e0e

      Concluding

      It makes sense why Tesla’s power system could not be implemented at that time, what is stupid, really ignorant, is why are we not using it today? We have scientists crying the sky is falling with this climate change, and demanding humanity to return to their cave environment to save the planet. Are we so stupid to not use our brains and get off this antiquated, 120 year old AC system. If we want to clean up our environment, we first need to make some very basic changes, not just crying in the soup and declaring stupid solutions.

      Delete
  3. Does Aether exist according to modern physics?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Before we move on to a discussion on the merits or demerits of an Aether, it is probably best to try to understand the theory that replaced it, namely, special relativity. The best way in which to understand the implications of special relativity is through a philosophical approach. In order to understand special relativity, think of two planets in space. The planets are separated by a distance of a light year, a slender space corridor has been established between these two planets, that we can call Planet A and Planet B, that is only 10Km in diameter. Imagine that this is a very busy corridor, with at least a 1000 vehicles all traveling at near light speed going to and from the two planets (i.e., bi-directional traffic) at any given time. Given that in order to keep the speed of light constant each of these 1000 objects traveling at near light speeds are all seeing a different space, with a different time and space for each of the other 999 space commuters, time and space must become incredibly convoluted? What this in effect means is that the human mind does not exist in space, reality in the form that we are used to it does not exist.

      Consider the following:-

      An observer on Earth watches two spaceships. According to his measurements, spaceship A is traveling away from Earth at half the speed of light (0.5c), and spaceship B is approaching Earth at 0.75 c. How fast is spaceship A moving according to the crew on spaceship B?

      Obviously, if the two speeds are added together (0.5c + 0.75c = 1.25c) it would exceed the speed of light. In order to prevent this the formula :

      v = a + b/(1+ab/c2) is used in this case : 0.5 + 0.75/ (1+( 0.5 x 0.75/c2)) =0.9c

      Similarly, the observer on earth would also see the two spaceships approaching each other at 0.9c rather than the incremental speed of 1.25c. According to special relativity, the numerical answer makes sense. Firstly, it is established that velocity will never be greater than c. Second, because spaceships A and B are approaching each other, we expect that the speed of A relative to B will be greater than the speed of either of the spaceships as measured by an observer on Earth. The material fact that is often lost sight of in this kind of navel-gazing calculations is that these are real disturbances in space. Each of the observers is experiencing a unique distortion of time and space if you have a thousand observers on each of the thousand spaceships each of them would be experiencing a different time and space experience and a different time and space for the other 9,99 space commuters also. Does this, apart from a certain philosophical schadenfreude, make sense? If one is absolutely realistic about it, it doesn’t.

      Delete
    2. Obviously, if there is no means of knowing either distances or intervals of time, and each of those intervals of time represent not an abstract figment of the imagination of the human mind but something tangible and real as depicted by the disparate ages of the twins in the twin paradox, everyone experiences a different reality, everyone lives in a different space and time. Reality, according to special relativity does not exist. But the most absurd element of all this is to imagine that by using a few hackneyed equations it would be possible for man to negotiate and navigate the vast Universe and have some idea of where he is. Look at the derivation of the speed of light as a dimensionless quantity which is how it is used in special relativity according to Schutz and Einstein:

      What we shall now do is adopt a new unit for time, the meter. One meter of time is the time it takes light to travel one meter. The speed of light in these units is:

      c = distance light travels/ the given time interval

      = 1m / the time it takes light to travel one meter

      = 1m / 1m = 1

      So if we consistently measure time in meters, then c is not merely 1, it is also dimensionless!

      There you have it these are the kind of figures that will enable you to track across millions or is it billions of light-years of space.

      Before leaving the topic of relativity it might be of some interest to see what scientists of the time thought of relativity: Ernest Rutherford: “No anglo-saxon can understand relativity. They have too much sense.” And “The theory of relativity by Einstein, quite apart from any question of its validity, cannot but be regarded as a magnificent work of art.”

      With regard to quantum mechanics he said: “ If your experiment needs statistics, you ought to have done a better experiment.”

      In his book Relativity, Joke or Swindle Louis Essen the inventor of the atomic clock quotes: The splitter of the atom (Rutherford) as treating relativity as a joke and quotes Soddy (co-discoverer of the transmutation of elements) as thinking of it as a swindle. He goes on to say if these eminent people have been ignored what chance has this author of changing the ‘swindle’?

      Nikolai Tesla had this to say on relativity: “Einstein’s theory of relativity is] a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king… its exponents are brilliant men, but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists.” ~ Nikola Tesla, Inventor and Electrical Engineer (1856-1943)

      Delete
    3. Needless to say that numerous other distinguished physicists also debunked special relativity all to no avail.

      But what does an Aether theory have to offer? If we ignore the absurd luminiferous version of the aether which would have to be both solid and permeable to matter at the same time the Aether is a fantastic concept. The Aether has the following properties to offer. Firstly it would provide a Universal frame of reference. This means that all positions in the universe, even the positions of stars billions of light years distant can be physically referenced with respect to the Aether. This is possible since there is no question of length contraction in a universal frame of reference. Secondly, all time would be absolute, in other words, you could travel to stars a billion kilometres distant and calculate the time with respect to Greenwich mean time. In other words, the Universe returns from the incredibly twisted and convoluted spacetime of special relativity to everyday terrestrial physics. The third phenomenon would be that the speed of light is constant regardless of the motion of the observer or the source or of either simultaneously because it is a wave traveling through a medium and its speed is solely governed by the properties of the medium. Thus, it would travel at the same speed regardless of the energy imparted to it, its amplitude might increase but the velocity would stay the same. Fourthly the existence of an Aether would explain the mass-energy equivalence and why nothing in the Universe can exceed the speed of light. The Aether (as conceived by Gestalt Aether Theory) is the closest thing to pure energy that we know of. Any object trying to travel through this pure energy would experience a rapid increase in mass as the speed increased, till at near the speed of light the mass of the object would become infinite! Last but not least an Aether would offer an explanation for why the speed of light is constant and not something pulled out of a top hat without explanation as special relativity does.

      Delete
  4. How does the Einstein's theory of relativity reject possibility of aether?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. “Einstein did not reject the idea of an aether he merely realised that Maxwell’s equations showed that there was no need for one.” When examined in greater detail one has to ask oneself is this conclusion true? Obviously the answer is that it isn’t! Look at the inverse square rule for the propagation of electromagnetic radiation, renormalisation and other problems arising from this central issue that there was no need for an aether. These might seem like trivial objections but they are central to the issues at stake in physics today. For instance Quantum mechanics explains the inverse square law of the propagation of light by stating that from the moment light is emitted at its source it has no physical existence at all! Instead it exists as an abstract mathematical wave function that exists nowhere and everywhere simultaneously and only re-manifests itself as something real at the point it is detected. I think that this is an outrageously and ridiculously obfuscated fabrication for a phenomenon that is so easily explained by the presence of a medium and which furthermore is a property that is exhibited by all waves travelling through a medium. True, light and electromagnetic radiation have other properties such as its existence as discrete individual packets of energy called quanta but as Gestalt Aether Theory demonstrates this is perfectly elucidated by the right model of the aether, SR on the other hand offers absolutely nothing in this regard. It is all very well to glibly state that: “Einstein’s theory of Special Relativity does not reject the possibility of an aether. It simply does not require an aether.” and maybe feel clever about it but in actual fact it is the rejection of the possibility of an aether that has raised most of the unsolved problems in physics. Special Relativity for all the vehemence with which it is touted has no explanation at all for why light ( electromagnetic radiation) follows the inverse square law of propagation, neither does it have an explanation for how it is possible for individual photons to follow the inverse square law and yet to maintain the original energy(identity) with which they were emitted by the electron. Further the kooky interpretations given to special relativity stating that objects don’t actually contract or that time does not really dilate that it is just a question of kinematics, seems to be in itself something of a paradox; either a result is due to some effect or it isn’t. To say that it is and it isn’t is to just go round in circles. In any event all that SR has to do with the propagation of electromagnetic radiation is the speed at which it propagates, where the answer is not satisfactory precisely because it ignores all of the other phenomena accompanying the propagation of electromagnetic radiation, SR has nothing else to offer as far as an explanation of the propagation of electromagnetic radiation goes let alone an explanation of why it is quantised or for why it exhibits the properties it does.

      Delete
    2. The whole concept of an aether that is only associated within the infinitesimal confines of the earth and its immediate surroundings ( when viewed in relation to the Universe) is the biggest absurdity. Obviously an aether that explains the propagation of electromagnetic radiation over billions of light years would have to permeate the entire Universe and not just our tiny speck of it. Gestalt Aether Theory offers such a universal aether model, explains how it came about and demonstrates that this is indeed the medium through which light and electromagnetic radiation travel. It explains the wave like and the particle properties of light, it shows how photons are discrete individual quanta of energy, it shows how they can preserve their energy almost indefinitely and most importantly it explains all of this in the same exact terms in which other waves such as sound and water waves propagate. For instance in any wave it is the energy that travels not the actual molecule or atom, this is precisely the terms in which the propagation of electromagnetic radiation is explained by GAT. It is not individual photons that move it is their energy that is transferred.

      Delete
  5. What are the latest developments in power storage technologies (batteries etc)?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. More details: energy storage battery

      Uninterruptible power supply for a city? It takes a huge battery
      Wouldn’t it be nice if we didn’t have to worry about the power going off suddenly with the loss of what you had been doing at the computer? It is called an uninterruptible power supply. You can buy one for your computer that will keep it going for some dozens of minutes. What if you were trying to provide power to a small city? Could you keep it going for 4 or more hours?

      Delete
  6. Can a car alternator be used as a wind generator?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Using an automotive alternator to construct a wind-powered electrical generator can reduce or eliminate dependency on "grid" power, even if the wind turbine is only used for lighting or recharging batteries. The average backyard engineer can construct a wind power plant in about two hours.

      Create or purchase several propellers. A propeller will have a leading edge that is curved, so that passing air will force it away from the source. Tacking the ends together at a central focal point will keep this force constant, and push the propellers in a circular motion.

      Fabricate a propeller/vane assembly. Mounting several propellers to a rotating surface (ball-bearing wheel), then mounting a directional vane to the rear of the rotating wheel's mount will turn wind energy into a mechanical force.

      Attach the alternator to the propeller assembly. The inside of the propeller wheel will rotate, and this can be used to turn an alternator's pulley by welding a suitable automotive pulley to the wheel's surface, then driving the alternator with a belt. In some instances, welding the alternator directly to the rotating wheel makes sense, but an automotive belt setup can allow easier maintenance for the equipment. Mount the alternator onto the frame of the stand, below the propeller assembly. Adjust the height of the alternator until the belt is tight, then secure the alternator.

      Place the entire turbine into a high-wind location. As the propellers turn, the pulley drives the belt, which turns the alternator and generates electricity. The rear vane will point the propeller assembly at the wind source.

      Delete

Powered by Blogger.